Oct 30, · The strengths of the cosmological argument The strengths of the cosmological argument are the strengths of inductive reasoning: inductive arguments begin with something that we can observe. Inductive reasoning begins with experience which may be universal (i.e. everyone has had it) or it may at least be blogger.comted Reading Time: 4 mins The Cosmological Argument Analysis of the three arguments related to the Proof for the Existence of a god, I found all three arguments to be very convincing, opinionating and interesting. These arguments appeared to be based on personal opinions, while convincing the reader to their beliefs from either a religious view, logical view or natural Cosmological Argument Essay The Cosmological Argument. The Cosmological Argument An important argument to try and prove the existence of God is the Argument On Cosmological Argument. Cosmological arguments are one of the oldest types of arguments for the existence of Regarding the Cosmological
An Analysis of Aquinas’ Cosmological Argument: [Essay Example], words GradesFixer
There are cosmological argument essay versions of the argument, the classic being that of St. Thomas Aquinas. Other significant figures include Leibniz and Kant, cosmological argument essay. The Medieval philosopher, St. Thomas Aquinas, cosmological argument essay, provided five arguments in his book, the Summa Theologica, the first three of which are cosmological: the argument from motion, cosmological argument essay, the argument from causation and the argument from necessity and contingency, cosmological argument essay.
In his Second Way, the argument from causation, cosmological argument essay, Aquinas argues that nothing causes itself, so if the universe was to exist — which it does - there must be a first cause.
P1 There is an order of efficient causes every event has a cause P2 Nothing can be the cause of itself P3 Cosmological argument essay this order of causes goes back infinitely — then there would be no First Cause P4 If 3 were true, then there would cosmological argument essay no subsequent causes, cosmological argument essay, but this is false.
C There must be a First Cause the source of all causes and this we call God Aquinas argues that nothing can cause itself because if something were the cause of itself it would have to be prior to itself, which is impossible.
Therefore, if the universe was to exist at all there needs to be a first cause which began a chain of cause cosmological argument essay effect. This argument is reductio ad absurdum. Aquinas attempts to argue that God must exist because an absurd result would follow from the denial of his existence; he uses premises three and four to demonstrate the impossibility of there being no first cause, by demonstrating that if there was no first cause then the present state would not exist — something which is obviously false, cosmological argument essay.
In support of premises 3 and 4 of the argument from causation, Immanuel Kant also argues that an infinite chain of causes is something that, by definition, could never be completed; if the causes that lead up to the existence of us and the world really stretched off in to an infinite past, then there would have to be an infinity of causes occurring before the world could come to be.
Kant argues that this is impossible, as if there were an infinite number of causes prior to the present state, then the present state could never come to be. Since the present state has come to be, there cannot be an infinity of causes and in turn there must be a first cause, which people call God.
However, philosopher Gottfried Leibniz views the internal regress of the universe differently, with cosmological argument essay principle of Sufficient Reason suggesting that since there does not appear to be anything within the universe itself to say why it exists, one can conclude that there is sufficient reason to believe in a great cause outside the universe. In this way, Leibniz argues that the uncaused causer must exist outside the series of causes, infinite though this series may be; he argues, in turn, that such causer must be in esse.
This is different from the arguments from motion and causation in that it is based upon the contingency of the universe and cosmological argument essay everything in it, cosmological argument essay. P1 Everything in the universe is contingent on something else. P2 Being contingent means cosmological argument essay something need not exist P3 If everything need not exist, at some time they did not exist P4 If at one time nothing existed, nothing would exist today P5 Things exist today C Therefore, there must be a non-contingent or necessary being to explain this God Here, Aquinas argues that since the universe is contingent, it cannot be the cause of its own existence and is not necessary.
Therefore, a necessary being is required to bring the universe in cosmological argument essay existence — where all things are contingent and in turn unnecessary, God is by contrast a necessary being as he is not contingent upon anything else. Another simpler version of the Cosmological Argument is the Kalam argument. This is an Islamic form of the argument which goes back to the Muslim philosopher Al-Kindi but which has also seen support from contemporary philosopher, William L Craig.
However, the Cosmological Argument also faces several objections. In response to this, it has been argued that there must be an exception to the rule and that this is proved by its reductio ad absurdum form; if there was no exception, no uncaused causer, then the universe would have no cause and it could never come to exist.
There is, though, also a retort to this response to the objection. It could be argued that instead of God being the exception to the causal rule, the universe itself could be the exception, with only the things within it having to follow the rule. Furthermore, we could say that the existence of the universe does not need any further explanation: it simply is.
A further objection comes from Hume, who, in line with his epistemology, cosmological argument essay, suggests our cognitive inability to comprehend the nature of a metaphysical superentity powerful enough to bring the universe in to existence.
In this way, he argues that we have no reason to infer what brought the universe in to existence. An unwarranted inference is required to claim that it is actually God. Hume also argues that the Cosmological Argument suffers from the fallacy of composition, an idea later supported by Russell. The fallacy of composition is the fallacy of assuming that since there is some property common to each part of a group, it follows that this property applies to the group as a whole, cosmological argument essay.
Therefore, although every individual part of the universe may have a cause, it does not necessarily follow that the universe itself must have a cause. To conclude, cosmological argument essay, the Cosmological argument is an a posteriori argument whose aim is to attempt to prove the existence of God.
Both the Kalam cosmological argument and those of St. Thomas Aquinas attempt to prove this existence through reductio ad absurdum means, demonstrating that without a first cause, the present state would be impossible.
However, the strongest objection to the cosmological argument is as a result of its a posteriori basis; that what we see and experience, within the universe, must apply to the universe as a whole. Hume objects to the assumption that because that within the universe is subject to causation, the universe as a whole must also follow this rule.
Although it can be argued this fallacy of composition does not cosmological argument essay apply in every circumstance, there is no way of ensuring that it does not apply in terms of the whole universe, and in turn the soundness of the cosmological argument cannot be ensured. Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student, cosmological argument essay.
Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. We will occasionally send cosmological argument essay account related emails. This essay is not unique. Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper. Want us to write one just for you? com uses cookies. This essay has been submitted by a student, cosmological argument essay. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers. Get help with writing.
Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you. Your time is important. Get essay help. Related Essays The Concept Of Discipleship And Its Relevance To The Modern Christian Faith Essay, cosmological argument essay.
Effects Of Defining God As The Unknown Essay. Cosmological argument essay Proving The Existence Of God Essay. Proof Of The Existence Of Allah Essay. Analysis Of Various Proofs Cosmological argument essay The Existence Of God Essay.
Analysis Of The Book Of Job Essay. Find Free Essays We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling. Order Now. Your essay sample has been sent. Order now. Related Topics Problem of Cosmological argument essay Essays Judaism Essays God Essays Crusades Essays Karma Essays. Hi there! Are you interested in getting a customized paper? Check it out! Having trouble finding the perfect essay?
Hire a writer. Haven't found the right essay? Get an expert to write you the one you need! Get your paper now. Professional writers and researchers. Sources and citation are provided.
Leibnizian Cosmological Argument Explained and Refuted - Cosmological Argument for God
, time: 7:45Essay: Cosmological Argument - Philosophical Investigations
The cosmological argument is an a posteriori argument which intends to prove that there is an intelligent being that exists; the being is distinct from the universe, explains the existence of the universe, and is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent and omnibenevolent The cosmological argument is an argument which states the universe is not explicable without reference to causes and factors outside itself. The cosmological argument is not just a Christian attempt to prove the existence of the classical theistic deity Oct 26, · The aim of the Cosmological argument is to attempt to prove God’s existence by showing that an infinite regress of causal chains is logically impossible, and in turn, that there must have been a first cause. It highlights the problems of infinite regression and suggests God’s existence as a solution
No comments:
Post a Comment